Nnamdi Kanu’s lawyer speaks on Buhari’s comments on IPOB leader

0
50
Advertisements

Ifeanyi Ejiofor, the lead counsel to the leader of outlawed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has faulted President Muhammadu Buhari’s comments on Mr Kanu’s court trial.

The lawyer disclosed this in a statement on Friday. Mr Buhari, during a bilateral meeting with Boris Johnson, the British Prime Minister on the margins of the 26th Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Kigali, Rwanda, on Thursday, reiterated his earlier position that Mr Kanu jumped bail in 2017 while he was being tried in court. He also suggested that the IPOB leader would still jump bail if he was to be granted bail again, insisting that he must defend himself in the court.

Mr Ejiofor described Mr Buhari’s comments as “careless, mischievous, and utterly false”.He

said the comments have confirmed the president’s alleged partisan stance on the matter.

The lawyer insisted that Mr Kanu did not jump bail but was compelled to flee the country after his Afara-ukwu residence was invaded by the Nigerian security forces in September, 2017. Mr Kanu is billed to appear in court on June 28 for continuation of his trial. Mr Ejiofor said the President’s comment, coming barely a week to the court sitting, was intended to influence the court ruling in favour of the Nigerian government.

“What really was the raison d’ etre for the statement? Is it a veiled warning to the court? Does it preempt an already settled position? Is there a nexus between this statement and the ultimate decision that would eventuate on the application?” he said.

Mr Ejiofor said it was unfortunate that the President made the comments despite declaring at different events that he would not interfere in the judicial proceedings, after rejecting appeals by some Igbo leaders to intervene for Mr Kanu through a political solution.

He accused Mr Buhari of “usurping” the judicial powers of the court noting that his statement was capable of “preempting the ruling of the court and prejudicing the entire proceedings.

Leave a comment